More ranting. Look at it from the perspective of what it might mean in terms of that outside our perception.

Have you ever questioned what thinking is?

It's the way we perceive what we experiment.

If we deem it so, we deem it to exist. Even if it's all in our minds, to us it exists, and there's nothing to prove it wrong.

Thus, when we think, we make things exist.

And why would someone would make an illusion that we are thinking? That way, we get proven we exist even faster: someone wants us to think we aren't thinking. Which is irrevelant, since we think we exist, therefore we exist. And when we think we don't...we exist too, since otherwise you'd have to stop thinking.

And you can't do that...unless you're dead. Or in coma. And people awake from coma, so that means we exist beyond this life.

Answer good enough for you? Or do I need to...digest a bit more ranting for ya?

I think therefore I am. But what if my thinking isn't really thinking and merely some sort of perception of thinking? Like I'm not thinking and something else puts me under the illusion that I'm thinking. Or something. Would I know? Or anyone else for that matter? It'd be weird to think like this if I wasn't capable of thinking. But it could be a ploy to put my mind at ease that I am capable of thinking and therefore existing.

That's a bit of a mind****, aye?
Oh it has a solution which would indicate both that I think and am, even if not conclusively. But, I'll be mean and withhold it.
Think about it.

Yeah, true.
Or sometimes a full editorial department screws up and I see the mother of all mistakes in a magazine...

But yeah, so far nothing.

I know it's a joke, somehow.

But, I do that because I really want to polish my work. It may be a Pulitzer prize sure winner, but if people aren't interested in reading it, it's not of much help. Sometimes, mistakes are so subtle the naked eye can't see them, but the subconscious notices it.

Twas a joke.
It's just the story doesn't really change so much.
It's good and stays good. If I wanted to be an asshole I could nitpick it all day with spelling and grammar checkers and all manner of things, but that doesn't really interest me.

Know what I'm saying? You haven't left much room for improvement, yet still desire critique.

I would also luv some consistency. A critique is a good critique when it's consistent, or when it explains it's divergences.

If you don't like it, you wouldn't post, aye? Hence, I assume this as "I love the story"...or "I'm a masochist", whichever suits your mood. Point is, you want more story, and I deliver more story. But...later, mmkay?

Critique = more story?
Hmmmm.... *lightbulb*
YOUR STORY SUCKS!!
IT'S TOO SHORT!!
THE CHARACTERS ARE LESS THAN INTERESTING!!
Well not really. But whatever motivates you.

Time for another V-Note!!

What to add today?

Ah!!

Give more promotion to my story!!! Remember, promotions equal more stories!! And critique of any kind accelerates that!!

Are you sure?

May you point me to the answer?

Just remember, it's not the questionnaire relating to death and what do you think about it. It's the one where you define what's your drive in the club has been. It's my second-to-last post.

Dude. I just realised. I've already done the questionaire.

Sure. My MSN is celtic_silver_89@hotmail.com
I'll get on that questionaire now.

Gasp!!!

Why, I feel like giving another V-Note to ya, buddy...

Also, interested in MSN sharing? Good buddies tend to do that, aye?

Oh, and...try to fill the lil' questionnaire in the club. I got a surprise for ya if I manage to get all those answers. And I will keep it 'til I get the answers.

V-NOTED.
A tribute to the leader of the SoI!

Well, I gave two wondrous u-notes to future Bouncer around here, so I said to myself "Self, should I v-note this wondrous mate?" "Sure, self, go ahead and tick 'im off!!!"

Here. Tick'd, mate.