Weapon or the Wielder?

[Crazy Chocobo]

I believe the wielder is the only thing that is important. Without the wielder, there is nothing. You need a wielder to be able to use a weapon. The weapon is very handy to have but without anyone to wield it, it's rather useless.

Morik the Rogue said it perfectly.

[Testbug]

Weapon. Without weapon is hard to make damage. Of course there is Monk class that doesn't need weapon. And some FF's has make own weapons to some of characters. FF VI you can add almost any weapon to anyone so in that game wielder demands which weapon you give. But not in others because weapons are choosed and you can't do anything to it. You just have to deal with it.

[-Xu-]

Both, a weapon has to be suited to the person.
I've used quite a few styles of weaponry in some of my martial arts classes, and you just prefer some weapons over others, and that counts for a lot. You find them easier to train with, and are better with them than a weapon you dislike even if you have trained the same with it.

[Simply"Kit"]

***Ah! finaly a person that agrees!a man who knows the way of the martial arts....well as i said before many of you guys would relate this mater in reality but dont forget the game too ok.Samus based it on his martial arts classes,but I also got the same principle of "Perfecrt harmony" between the weapon and wielder in martial arts and can even be related to thegame also! Hurrah!!! one agrees!

***HALLER BACK!!!***