Bush doesn't make decisions without the help of his cabinet, he is the final word, but he gets the information from them.
And the people of their cabinet(especially their aides) are important people in their area of expertise.
There's probably some factor involved in which Bush actually has an excuse. A rating system which carbon monoxide surprisingly doesn't fall into for some strange reason.
Quote:
|
carbon monoxide, for one, can be deadly................not to mention a pollutant...that stuttering fool.
|
Do you know what a pollutant is? The official standards deciding what a pollutant are...
I don't think deadly is a standard for pollutant, because fire, hemlock, and poison dart frogs aren't pollutants. Neither are ravenous man eating sharks.
So deadly doesn't work as a sole criteria.
EDIT: I have searched online for quite a while using the search term: ("George W Bush" "carbon monoxide" pollutant) Copy and paste the content in the parentheses if you feel like you can find what I missed (I didn't look at every article on the list, only the ones on the first page with seemingly relevant titles)
I have found no articles regarding this issue at all, does anyone mind linking me to one?